But to the President, the drama over the
document is “laughable”, according to House Presidential Liasson Officer Sumaila Kawu.
Saraki spoke after a two-hour closed session to “thorougly discuss and to take far-reaching discussion on the budget”.
He recalled that the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions was told to investigate the matter.
He said the Senate discovered from the findings of its Ethics committee that Enang printed and submitted to the Senate a different version of the document.
He said: “We have received the report of the Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions on investigations surrounding 2016 Appropriation Bill.
“Our finding is that Senator Ita Enang, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (SSA), printed copies of the 2016 Appropriation Bill and brought to the Senate.
“We have discovered that what he brought is different from the version presented by Mr. President.
“We have resolved to consider only the version presented by Mr. President as soon as we receive soft copy of the original document from the Executive.”
Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi, told reporters immediately after Senate plenary that:
“The report of the investigation by the committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petition has been submitted in the Executive session because it was a decision we took in the last Executive session on Tuesday.
“Now our findings are these, that Mr. President did lay the budget in the Joint session of the National Assembly.
“Thereafter, the Senate went on recess and upon resumption copies of the document were produced by Senator Ita Enang, who is the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters for Senate and copies were submitted to both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
“What we found out is that the document submitted by Senator Ita Enang upon our resumption has some differences and discrepancies with what was originally laid by Mr. President in the joint sitting of the National Assembly.
“However, the Senate in defence of its integrity and honour will not work with what has not been laid in the National Assembly.
“We are constitutionally mandated and duty-bound to consider only that budget that has been so laid by Mr. President.
“Right now, for reproduction, we are awaiting the soft copy of the originally submitted budget so that the National Assembly can reproduce copies of the budget itself.
“Because if we reproduce ourselves, then we have confidence in the fact that what we reproduced is what was originally submitted to us.
“The institution of the Senate will not and can not do anything that is illegal. We will not do any thing that will not promote the unity, integrity and welfare of Nigerians.”
Abdullahi said: “The budget submitted by the President is not missing. We already have copies of it but what we are saying is that for us to reproduce for our members, it is easier, based on the quantum of document that has to be produced, that we get the soft copy of that original version so that we can reproduce it.”
He insisted that “by next week, we want to go down to business; senators have picked dates to speak during the three days set aside for debate of the 2016 budget.”
Abdullahi also said that the Senate leadership was mandated to speak with all those concerned with the document. “That was why the Senate President was in touch with Mr. President.”
The Senate spokesperson, however, refused to speak on the claim by the House of Representatives that it had its own original version of the fiscal document.
He also declined to state the differences in the version submitted by Enang and the one presented by President Buhari.
“I am not in the position to say the differences between the document submitted by the President and the one brought by Ita Enang. The committee that investigated the issue did not include that in their report.”
No comments:
Post a Comment